« Why Would Someone Do this? - The California Wildfires | Main | When Did Halloween Become the Day of Bloody Killers? »

Oct30
Who's Responsible for Your Education?

My blogging friend Lewis has raised some very interesting questions about the need to do more about education in this country.

"So where is the outcry? Why isn't education more of a rallying cry for new ideas, better teachers, better pay for good teachers and involved parents? What can be done to change the coarse (sic) of what appears to be a cultural crisis? What can we do to make a difference in education?"

My first question back is: Why is it my responsibility to help those who do not want to try? We all think slavery is wrong, and it is, so we cannot force someone to learn who does not want to. Maybe we need to make parents responsible for their kids entire life support. Then they might push them a little harder. If you have to pay when your kids wreck the car you make sure they have insurance, training, and know what happens if they mess-up.

I went to school. I studied hard. No one forced me to get a good education. I ended up with a PhD in biology from Caltech. There are a lot of people who do that and more. Rarely do you read about someone who was forced to learn, that then went on to great success. I think it has something to do with the attitude from the beginning. Perhaps is people are made to be more directly responsible for their own actions they will begin to see how important an education is.

What we have now, is a system that seems to want to lower entrance requirements, job skill needs, and personal responsibility. Many politicians and social saviors find it very easy to take from others who have, and give it to those who don't want to learn to earn a living. Perhaps if they emptied their own wallets and bank accounts first they would get more of my respect. Why should I have to provide jobs to someone who did not want to learn enough to have a job? 

I'm not saying that young children are able to make a choice and that they should be held accountable but once a person has reached the age of 14 they know enough to see that there are consequences. I am saying that we need to push for a better basic education and have the means for those who want to learn more than that to go farther. We should also have a means for those who realize later in life that they need help to get it. Most likely those people have paid taxes and deserve to get the education they forgot to get the first time around.

Maybe we need to start posting job skill requirements, salaries, and the expected living wage when they graduate, so that students can see what they will and will not be able to live on in the future. Of course, if I had known when I started graduate school that a PhD biologist would only make $24,000/year, but a PhD in chemistry would average $65,000/year with no post-doctoral experience I may have tried harder in some of my math classes. Then again, maybe I would have taken that job I was offered after I got my BA in biology - starting salary $24,000! and skipped the 7 years of laboratory work.

These are my quick impressions but some feelings I have had for a while. As an employer I am always willing to help those who try to help themselves. I know that people get in a bind or make bad decisions at times and that we need to lift them up. What we should not be expected to do it to employ those who are unqualified by their own choice.


4 Comments/Trackbacks




Roger,

Thank you for adding to the conversation. I am a big believer in personal responsibility; however, we need leadership at all levels, including businesses, to turn our education system around. I do think everyone is responsible to some degree for providing our children with the best educational system in the world.

Lewis,
I hope I was not to negative but I just worry that we are becoming a nanny society and not the self-determination nation we have been.

Hi Roger,

I understand your concerns about the need for personal responsibility, I do however have several concerns about the points you make here. It is my experience that in economically disadvantaged areas, many of the educators seem to have lost their morale and belief that they can educate their students. They do lower their standards and it is my belief that the students achieve what is expected of them. There is also a problem with teachers in inner cities that don't understand that they are secondary care-givers. It may not be fair but it is true - many students in inner cities spend more time at school than they do with their parents/guardians.

I think it is important to recognize that the problem with our educational system goes well beyond the money factor. Almost half of the CA budget is set aside for education yet our students continue to be some of the lowest performers nationwide. As far as I can tell the system is antiquated and students are bored with a system that really seems to force feed them information without making any connections to anything.

I've heard the "in my day" argument and my response is always, this is not your day. How can you expect a student to care about learning when he's hungry, homeless, worried about getting shot on the way home, etc.? Please don't take this as me making excuses for struggling students, however I believe it is on the teacher to engage the student as much as it is for the students to be engaged. Take Erin Gruwell and the Freedom Writers for example: she knew that she had to do something innovative in order to engage her students and in the end she inspired them to love learning and take responsibility for their own lives by helping them understand the power of choice.

I don't have all the answers but it is proven that one of the key factors in someones' success is influence of a mentor or someone outside the immediate family. Hopefully more people will step up and become youth mentors, especially in the inner cities where education has so little perceived value. This may not have been exactly what you were talking about but I could not resist adding my two cents ;-).

Kim,
Your two cents are worth a lot. I appreciate your comments and coming from your background I know you are speaking from experience.

What is missing is the motivation on all sides. When everyone graduates then there is no reason to try to achieve. There is almost no value in trying to do better when it receives no recognition. We worry more about the self-esteem of the underachiever than we do about those who actually achieve.
Why does a football player who is paid millions find that it is not enough for him. He has to have dog fights to be a part of his community. Why did he not choose to be more actively engaged in his local school? No reward, or an insufficient reward.

If we want teachers to be surrogate parents then the real parents need to start giving up the kids. How's that for harsh! Maybe their tax deduction should be reduced if they are not going to actually parent. Do you think things would change? I know we can't do that but I think we have to stop rewarding people who take no thought other than to have the children.

When people boo Dr. Cosby for trying to raise standards and cheer a "musician" for promoting violence against women, cops, and other races we have a big problem. What motivation can overcome the lack of respect for others? It is clear that when people will not take care of themselves they are not going to take care of others either.

It all comes back to the values taught at home. If none are taught there, then kids learn them from other places. Too often the learning takes place in the wrong places.

submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Why Would Someone Do this? - The California Wildfires | Main | When Did Halloween Become the Day of Bloody Killers? »

Advertise


Maps for Modern Magellans

Purchase Maps for Modern Magellans


Related Resources

Text Link Ads script error: includes/local_148031.xml does not exist. Please create a blank file named includes/local_148031.xml.